data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adeea/adeeab7a40b1c0b01c4632449295694bb44fb874" alt="First amendment"
In summary, though not unqualified, a citizen's right to film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.
Recording police and other government officials in the discharge of their duties is explicitly allowed.
liberty of the press is the right of the lonely pamphleteer who uses carbon paper or a mimeograph just as much as of the large metropolitan publisher who utilizes the latest photocomposition methods. It has generally been held that the First Amendment does not guarantee the press a constitutional right of special access to information not available to the public generally. The press, in its historic connotation, comprehends every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.
Credentials are not needed to be considered press in the context of the First Amendment. The right to publish or broadcast an audio or audiovisual recording would be insecure, or largely ineffective, if the antecedent act of making the recording is wholly unprotected. The act of making an audio or audiovisual recording is necessarily included within the First Amendment's guarantee of speech and press rights as a corollary of the right to disseminate the resulting recording. Freedom of the press includes the right to record video and audioĪm. Being in this section does not mean you can rely on this information in your jurisdiction - or any jurisdiction.